UZBEKISTAN  ·  PRACTICE AREA

Dispute Resolution & Arbitration in Uzbekistan

Bond Stone advises on commercial dispute resolution in Uzbekistan — litigation before Uzbek economic courts, arbitration through the Tashkent International Arbitration Centre (TIAC) and international forums, cross-border enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards, and debt recovery. Bond Stone's Tashkent office provides direct access to Uzbek courts and regulatory authorities.

Uzbekistan has established the Tashkent International Arbitration Centre (TIAC), modernised its economic court procedures, acceded to the New York Convention, and is developing the Tashkent International Commercial Court (TICC) within the TIFC framework.

Primary authority: Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan; Economic Procedural Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan; Law "On International Commercial Arbitration" No. ZRU-674 dated 16 February 2021; Law "On Arbitration Courts" No. ZRU-64 dated 16 October 2006; New York Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958). Authority: lex.uz


Uzbekistan — Market Context 2025

7.7%

Real GDP growth in 2025

USD 43B

Investment implemented in 2025, of which USD 38.2B FDI — up 24% year on year

TIAC

Tashkent International Arbitration Centre — established and operational

Dispute Resolution Services

Commercial Litigation — Uzbek Economic Courts

Representation in commercial disputes before Uzbek economic courts — the primary forum for B2B disputes in Uzbekistan. Bond Stone handles contract disputes, debt recovery, shareholder claims, and regulatory challenges. Economic courts have exclusive competence over cases with foreign persons on property owned by the Republic of Uzbekistan, including privatisation and expropriation, and on real estate located in Uzbekistan (Economic Procedure Code, Art. 240).

TIAC — Tashkent International Arbitration Centre

The TIAC is Uzbekistan's main institutional arbitration forum. An award seated in Tashkent is enforced in Uzbekistan under Law No. ZRU-674 (Art. 51) and the Economic Procedure Code, and abroad under the New York Convention. Bond Stone advises on TIAC clause drafting, arbitrator selection, and representation in TIAC proceedings.

International Arbitration — ICC, LCIA, ISTAC

For disputes involving international counterparties, Bond Stone advises on institutional arbitration under ICC, LCIA, and ISTAC rules — including seat selection, governing law, and enforcement strategy. Bond Stone's ISTAC clause and forum strategy work for Kazakhstan–Turkey disputes is directly applicable to Uzbekistan–Turkey trade disputes.

Cross-border Enforcement

Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards in Uzbekistan. Uzbekistan is a party to the New York Convention (accession deposited 7 February 1996, in force 7 May 1996) and has judicial cooperation treaties with CIS states and a number of other jurisdictions. Without a treaty, a foreign judgment faces refusal (Economic Procedure Code, Arts. 248 and 255). Bond Stone advises on enforceability assessment, recognition procedure before Uzbek economic courts, and asset tracing and execution strategy.

Debt Recovery in Uzbekistan

Pre-action demand notices, economic court proceedings, court orders for receivables acknowledged in documents, and enforcement through Uzbek bailiff services. Bond Stone manages cross-border debt recovery mandates involving Chinese, Turkish, UAE, and European creditors with Uzbek debtors — from pre-action demand through court judgment and asset execution.

TICC — Tashkent International Commercial Court

The TICC is being established within the TIFC framework — an independent two-instance English-language court, not yet operating, with jurisdiction over disputes that parties submit to it by agreement. Clause wording should await the TIFC Acts and TICC rules. Bond Stone's AIFC Court experience is a useful reference point.



Detailed Guides

International Arbitration in Uzbekistan

TIAC, ICC, LCIA, ISTAC — clause drafting, seat selection, state entity restrictions, New York Convention enforcement

Enforcement of Foreign Judgments & Awards

New York Convention, CIS bilateral treaties, writ of execution, asset tracing and bailiff enforcement

Debt Collection in Uzbekistan

Pre-action demand, economic court proceedings, writ of execution, bailiff enforcement, bankruptcy track

TICC — Tashkent International Commercial Court

English-language court within the TIFC, not yet operating — jurisdiction by agreement, dispute resolution clause drafting

Uzbekistan Dispute Resolution — Forum Comparison

Factor Uzbek Economic Courts TIAC Arbitration TICC (when operational)
Governing law Uzbek law, or foreign law where applicable (Economic Procedure Code, Art. 14) Parties' choice TIFC Acts, then common law of England and Wales
Language Uzbek / Russian Parties' choice English
Confidentiality Public proceedings Confidential Public proceedings
International enforcement Via treaties only New York Convention — 170+ states Constitutional Law No. ZRU-1158, Article 29 — enforced as judgments of other Uzbek courts
Exclusive competence Yes — state-owned property, including privatisation and expropriation; Uzbek real estate (Economic Procedure Code, Art. 240) Contractual opt-in only Contractual opt-in available
Status Fully operational Fully operational In development — TIFC framework

Uzbekistan Arbitration Law — Key Features

Law on International Commercial Arbitration No. ZRU-674 (2021)

Uzbekistan's law on international commercial arbitration — adopted 16 February 2021. Modelled on the UNCITRAL Model Law, providing an internationally familiar framework. Domestic arbitration remains under the Law on Arbitration Courts No. ZRU-64 of 16 October 2006. Arbitration agreements must be in writing.

State entity restrictions

Disputes with foreign persons over property owned by the Republic of Uzbekistan fall within the exclusive competence of the Uzbek economic courts (Economic Procedure Code, Art. 240), so an arbitration clause may not hold for them. Bond Stone advises on arbitrability analysis for contracts with Uzbek state entities before the arbitration clause is finalised.

New York Convention enforcement

Uzbekistan acceded to the New York Convention, which entered into force for it on 7 May 1996. Foreign arbitral awards are recognised and enforced by Uzbek economic courts under the Convention. The grounds for refusal follow Article V, including public policy. Bond Stone advises on enforceability risk assessment before arbitral proceedings are commenced.

Limitation periods

The general limitation period is 3 years (Civil Code, Art. 150), from when the claimant knew or should have known of the breach. Legislation may set shorter or longer special periods (Art. 151). Bond Stone assesses limitation risk at the outset of every dispute resolution mandate in Uzbekistan.


Experience

Bond Stone has advised on dispute resolution and enforcement mandates in Uzbekistan across trade, manufacturing, pharmaceuticals, real estate, and professional services sectors — for Chinese, Turkish, UAE, and European clients. Client confidentiality is maintained across all matters.

Debt Recovery · Uzbekistan · China

Cross-border Debt Recovery — Chinese Creditor

Acting for a Chinese creditor in debt recovery proceedings against an Uzbek counterparty under a goods supply contract. Strategy: pre-action demand followed by economic court claim. Proceedings filed and actively managed.

Arbitration · TIAC · Uzbekistan

TIAC Arbitration — Distribution Dispute

Acting for a foreign manufacturer in TIAC arbitration against an Uzbek distributor arising from termination of an exclusive distribution agreement. Strategy: breach of contract and loss of profits claim under TIAC rules.

Enforcement · Uzbekistan · New York Convention

Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award

Advising a foreign creditor on enforcement of an international arbitral award against an Uzbek respondent — enforceability assessment under the New York Convention, recognition application to an Uzbek economic court, and asset tracing strategy.

Litigation · Uzbekistan · Corporate

Joint Venture Dispute — Shareholder Breakdown

Acting for a foreign investor in a shareholder dispute following joint venture breakdown in Uzbekistan — asset protection applications, claim for return of contributed capital, and parallel enforcement strategy across two jurisdictions.

Litigation · Uzbekistan · Construction

Construction Payment Dispute

Acting for an international construction contractor in debt recovery proceedings against an Uzbek subcontractor for unpaid works. Strategy: documentary evidence of completed works, claim for principal debt plus contractual penalty. Outcome: judgment obtained.

Arbitration · Uzbekistan · Pharmaceuticals

Pharmaceutical Contract — Licence Termination

Advising a foreign pharmaceutical company on a dispute arising from wrongful termination of a licence agreement by an Uzbek distributor — strategy assessment, arbitration clause analysis, and pre-arbitration negotiation mandate.

Debt Recovery · Uzbekistan · Turkey

Trade Debt Recovery — Turkish Supplier

Acting for a Turkish goods supplier in cross-border debt recovery against an Uzbek importer for non-payment under a supply contract. Strategy: pre-action demand under the contract terms, followed by TIAC arbitration proceedings.

Litigation · Uzbekistan · Real Estate

Real Estate — Lease Dispute

Acting for a foreign commercial tenant in a lease dispute before an Uzbek economic court — challenging unlawful early termination by the landlord and claiming compensation for losses and pre-paid rent. Outcome: settlement reached on favourable terms.

Advisory · Uzbekistan · Investment

Investment Dispute — SOE Privatisation

Advising a foreign investor on investment treaty protections following a dispute with Uzbek state authorities regarding the terms of a privatisation acquisition. BIT analysis and dispute resolution strategy prepared under the applicable bilateral investment treaty.


Investing in Uzbekistan

Uzbekistan — Investment Framework

Uzbekistan — International Financial Centre (Not Yet Operating)

Tashkent International Financial Centre (TIFC)

The TIFC framework includes the Tashkent International Commercial Court (TICC) — a two-instance English-language court, not yet operating, with jurisdiction over disputes that parties submit to it by agreement. Bond Stone is monitoring the TICC rules ahead of activation.

Tashkent International Financial Centre — full guide →

Why Bond Stone

Primary authority: lex.uz  ·  Related: Dispute Resolution in Kazakhstan


Discuss your Uzbekistan dispute

Contact Bond Stone for a confidential discussion about dispute resolution strategy, arbitration, or enforcement in Uzbekistan.

[email protected]
+7 (701) 729 76 72 — Almaty

Request a Confidential Consultation ← Corporate & Commercial Law TIFC →